Digital Science Art as an Ontological Metaphor

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 64 (7):7-25 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article considers the possibility of using digital scientific art as a tool for philosophical and aesthetic cognition. On the example of games of cellular automata and from the point of view of the paradigm of synergetics, a large-scale analogy of the dynamics of multi-element distributed systems of various natures is revealed. The question is raised about the nature of beauty, which is interpreted as a fundamental cosmic phenomenon. The concept of protoconstruct is viewed as a mental object, the properties of which are transferred to the objects and phenomena under study. As an example of digital protoconstructs, the article discusses the so-called cellular symmetroids. Cellular symmetroids can be considered from the point of view of scientific art as art objects. At the same time, they represent a deep ontological metaphor. A unique property of cellular symmetroids is spontaneous destruction and transition to quasi-chaotic dynamics. This feature can be linked to the idea of historical time, which is very unusual for mathematical objects. Mathematical structures that arise as a result of calculations according to this model are completely unique and inimitable, like the internal states of the soul or psyche of a thinking subject. At the same time, they are to the same extent determined by the previous state. Integrity, internal unity are inherent not only in symmetric structures but also in the chaos that is born after them, which, in contrast to stereotypical statistical intuitive ideas, is deterministic. However, such an abstract digital art, based on the unconventional mathematics of dynamic chaos, is an accurate ontological metaphor, a visualization of the eidos of the beauty in their relationship with the cosmic logos and the nature of the original creative chaos.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Digital wormholes.Elizabeth O’Neill - 2023 - AI and Society 38 (6):2713-2715.
Digital Design.M. Morris Mano & Michael D. Ciletti - 2002 - Pearson Educación.
Three fallacies of digital footprints.Kevin Lewis - 2015 - Big Data and Society 2 (2).
Digital Instances.Hetty Blades - 2015 - American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 7 (1).
Digital Hermeneutics as Hermeneutics of the Self.Alberto Romele - 2020 - Discipline filosofiche. 30 (2):187-203.
Comment on Norm Friesen’s.Estrid Sørensen - 2011 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 15 (3):206-208.
CesimaDigital: a tool for the History of Science.Odécio Souza - 2019 - Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science 24.
How Do We Need Universities in a Technological World?Viorel Guliciuc - 2009 - Dialogue and Universalism 19 (1-2):95-100.
The Digital Secret of the Moving Image.Enrico Terrone - 2014 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 51 (1):21-41.
Cultura y contracultura digital: un ensayo.Jorge Portilla - 2011 - Apuntes Filosóficos 20 (39).

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-22

Downloads
6 (#1,389,828)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Are We Living in a Computer Simulation?Nick Bostrom - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):243-255.
Are We Living in a Computer Simulation?Nick Bostrom - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):243-255.
Are we living in a computer simulation?By Nick Bostrom - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):243–255.
Rechnender Raum (Calculating Space).Konrad Zuse - 1969 - Schriften Zur Dataverarbeitung 1.
The rediscovery of time.Ilya Prigogine - 1984 - Zygon 19 (4):433-447.

Add more references