Dialogue - CEO Compensation

Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (4):679-691 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Must CEOs Be Saints? Contra Moriarty on CEO Abstemiousness by Robert KolbIn this journal, Jeffrey Moriarty argued that CEOs must refuse to accept compensation above the minimum compensation that will induce them to accept and per­form their jobs. Acting otherwise, he maintains, violates the CEO’s fiduciary duty, even for a CEO new to the firm. I argue that Moriarty’s conclusion rests on a failure to adequately distinguish when a person acts as a fiduciary from when she acts on her own account as a person. Further, Moriarty’s argument assumes that the CEO knows this minimum level of compensation. However, we learn the suitability of compensation only through the market process of wage negotiation, not through some process of introspection. I conclude that a CEO who abstains from interfering with the board of directors and its compensation com­mittee is morally free to negotiate for the highest wage available



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,594

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

53 (#220,185)

6 months
3 (#211,070)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrey Moriarty
Bentley University

References found in this work

Moral Saints.Susan Wolf - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy 79 (8):419-439.
If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're so Rich.G. A. Cohen - 2000 - The Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):1-26.
A Fiduciary Argument Against Stakeholder Theory.Alexei M. Marcoux - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1):1-24.
Do CEOs Get Paid Too Much?Jeffrey Moriarty - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (2):257-281.
The Uses and Abuses of Agency Theory.Joseph Heath - 2009 - Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (4):497-528.

View all 11 references / Add more references