Kant-Studien 109 (3):367-394 (2018)

Authors
Markus Kohl
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Abstract
I examine the division of labor between the Metaphysical Deduction (MD) and the Transcendental Deduction (TD). Against a common reading, I argue that the MD is insufficient to prove the a priori origin of the categories. For both Kant and his main opponent, namely Hume, the question of whether the categories have an a priori origin in the pure understanding is inseparable from the question of whether they have objective validity. Since the MD does not establish the objective validity of the categories, it cannot establish their a priori origin either. The MD is nevertheless an indispensable part of Kant's project because it lays the argumentative groundwork for the proof structure of the TD and because it provides the systematic plan for the future metaphysics of experience.
Keywords Categories  Metaphysical Deduction  Skepticism  Transcendental Deduction
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1515/kant-2018-3005
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,257
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Kant-Bibliographie 2018.Margit Ruffing - 2020 - Kant-Studien 111 (4):647-702.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Without the Categories.John Rosenthal - 1993 - International Philosophical Quarterly 33 (4):449-464.
Nonconceptualism, Hume’s Problem, and the Deduction.Anil Gomes - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (7):1687-1698.
Kant’s Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - London and Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Kant, Hume, and Problems of the Deduction of the Categories.V. V. Vasil'ev - 1996 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 34 (4):51-65.
Kant's Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction.Ian Proops - 2003 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2):209-229.
The Proof Structure of Kant's A-Deduction.Michael Barker - 2001 - Kant-Studien 92 (3):259-282.
What Were Kant’s Aims in the Deduction?Gary Hatfield - 2003 - Philosophical Topics 31 (1/2):165-198.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-05-02

Total views
58 ( #194,567 of 2,499,748 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,750 of 2,499,748 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes