Experience and perspectives of end-of-life care discussion and physician orders for life-sustaining treatment of Korea (POLST-K): a cross-sectional study

BMC Medical Ethics 24 (1):1-12 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

BackgroundThis study aimed to identify the healthcare providers’ experience and perspectives toward end-of-life care decisions focusing on end-of-life discussion and physician’s order of life-sustaining treatment documentation in Korea which are major parts of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Act.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted using a questionnaire developed by the authors. A total of 474 subjects—94 attending physicians, 87 resident physicians, and 293 nurses—participated in the survey, and the data analysis was performed in terms of frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation using the SPSS 24.0 program.ResultsStudy results showed that respondents were aware of terminal illness and physician’s order of life-sustaining treatment in Korea well enough except for some details. Physicians reported uncertainty in terminal state diagnosis and disease trajectory as the most challenging. Study participants regarded factors (related to relationships and communications) on the healthcare providers’ side as the major impediment to end-of-life discussion. Study respondents suggested that simplification of the process and more staff are required to facilitate end-of-life discussion and documentation.ConclusionBased on the study results, adequate education and training for better end-of-life discussion are required for future practice. Also, a simple and clear procedure for completing a physician’s order of life-sustaining treatment in Korea should be prepared and legal and ethical advice would be required. Since the enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Act, several revisions already have been made including disease categories, thus continuous education to update and support clinicians is also called for.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Critique of the Washington State POLST.Steven Pace - 2016 - Ethics and Medics 41 (9):2-4.
Polst.Sebastian Agredo - 2014 - Voices in Bioethics 1.
Bias and POLST Facilitation.Christian Brugger - 2017 - Ethics and Medics 42 (1):1-3.
Prospective Medical-Moral Decision Making.Peter J. Cataldo & Elliott Louis Bedford - 2015 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15 (1):53-61.
NCBC Guide to Completing the POLST Form.Ncbc Ethicists - 2018 - Ethics and Medics 43 (6):1-4.
Life-Sustaining Treatment under Dispute.Jackson Milton - 2020 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 20 (4):667-682.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-08

Downloads
19 (#775,535)

6 months
12 (#203,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Y. J. Hong
Yonsei University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references