Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (3):589-609 (2016)
AbstractWe analyze naturally occurring datasets from student use of educational technologies to explore a long-standing question of the scope of transfer of learning. We contrast a faculty theory of broad transfer with a component theory of more constrained transfer. To test these theories, we develop statistical models of them. These models use latent variables to represent mental functions that are changed while learning to cause a reduction in error rates for new tasks. Strong versions of these models provide a common explanation for the variance in task difficulty and transfer. Weak versions decouple difficulty and transfer explanations by describing task difficulty with parameters for each unique task. We evaluate these models in terms of both their prediction accuracy on held-out data and their power in explaining task difficulty and learning transfer. In comparisons across eight datasets, we find that the component models provide both better predictions and better explanations than the faculty models. Weak model variations tend to improve generalization across students, but hurt generalization across items and make a sacrifice to explanatory power. More generally, the approach could be used to identify malleable components of cognitive functions, such as spatial reasoning or executive functions.
Similar books and articles
Does self-efficacy mediate transfer effects in the learning of easy and difficult motor skills?David Stevens, David I. Anderson, Nicholas J. O’Dwyer & A. Mark Williams - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (3):1122-1128.
Systematic minds, unsystematic models: Learning transfer in humans and networks. [REVIEW]Steven Phillips - 1999 - Minds and Machines 9 (3):383-398.
Turning Around the Question of 'Transfer' in Education: Tracing the sociomaterial.Monica Dianne Mulcahy - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (12):1276-1289.
Acquisition and transfer in pattern-vs.-component discrimination learning.W. K. Estes & B. L. Hopkins - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (4):322.
Implicit Transfer of Reversed Temporal Structure in Visuomotor Sequence Learning.Kanji Tanaka & Katsumi Watanabe - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (3):565-579.
Retention of transfer in motor learning after twenty-four hours and after fourteen months.Carl P. Duncan & Benton J. Underwood - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (6):445.
A Bayesian Theory of Sequential Causal Learning and Abstract Transfer.Hongjing Lu, Randall R. Rojas, Tom Beckers & Alan L. Yuille - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (2):404-439.
The effect of task difficulty and amount of practice on proactive transfer.Abram M. Barch & Don Lewis - 1954 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 48 (2):134.
Transfer of training in motor learning as a function of distribution of practice.Victor E. Montgomery - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (6):440.
Studies in spatial learning. IV. The transfer of place learning to other starting paths.E. C. Tolman, B. F. Ritchie & D. Kalish - 1947 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (1):39.
Transfer in motor learning as a function of degree of first-task learning and inter-task similarity.Carl P. Duncan - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (1):1.
Neo-associativism: Limited learning transfer without binding symbol representations.Steven Phillips - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):350-351.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Discovering Psychological Principles by Mining Naturally Occurring Data Sets.Robert L. Goldstone & Gary Lupyan - 2016 - Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (3):548-568.
References found in this work
The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning.Kenneth R. Koedinger, Albert T. Corbett & Charles Perfetti - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (5):757-798.
LearnLab's DataShop: A Data Repository and Analytics Tool Set for Cognitive Science.Kenneth R. Koedinger, John C. Stamper, Brett Leber & Alida Skogsholm - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (3):668-669.
The Effect of Changed Data upon Reasoning.E. L. Thorndike - 1922 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 5 (1):33.
Seeing language learning inside the math: Cognitive analysis yields transfer.Kenneth R. Koedinger & Elizabeth A. McLaughlin - 2010 - In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society. pp. 471--476.