'New age' philosophies of science: constructivism, feminism and postmodernism

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):667-683 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper surveys three controversial new directions in research about the nature of science and briefly summarizes both the intellectual and sociological impact of this work. A bibliographic introduction to the major literature is provided and some fruitful directions for future research are proposed. Philosophers of science are also exhorted to perform 'community service' by correcting misunderstandings of the methods of science fostered by these new approaches

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Physics develops unaffected by constructivism.Helmut Schwegler - 2001 - Foundations of Science 6 (4):241-253.
Philosophy of Science After Feminism.Janet A. Kourany - 2010 - , US: Oxford University Press.
Local philosophies of science.Nick Huggett - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):137.
Scientists and war.Solly Zuckerman Zuckerman - 1967 - New York,: Harper & Row.
Radical Constructivism in Communication Science.A. Scholl - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):51-57.
Political constructivism.Peri Roberts - 2007 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
117 (#147,860)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Noretta Koertge
Indiana University, Bloomington

References found in this work

The social construction of what?Ian Hacking - 1999 - Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
The Structure of Science.Ernest Nagel - 1961 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):275-275.
The cement of the universe.John Leslie Mackie - 1974 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press.

View all 32 references / Add more references