A minimal Prikry-type forcing for singularizing a measurable cardinal

Journal of Symbolic Logic 78 (1):85-100 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, Gitik, Kanovei and the first author proved that for a classical Prikry forcing extension the family of the intermediate models can be parametrized by $\mathscr{P}(\omega)/\mathrm{finite}$. By modifying the standard Prikry tree forcing we define a Prikry-type forcing which also singularizes a measurable cardinal but which is minimal, i.e., there are \emph{no} intermediate models properly between the ground model and the generic extension. The proof relies on combining the rigidity of the tree structure with indiscernibility arguments resulting from the normality of the associated measures

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On closed unbounded sets consisting of former regulars.Moti Gitik - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):1-12.
Canonical seeds and Prikry trees.Joel David Hamkins - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (2):373-396.
Large cardinals and large dilators.Andy Lewis - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1496-1510.
Small forcing makes any cardinal superdestructible.Joel David Hamkins - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (1):51-58.
Gap forcing: Generalizing the lévy-Solovay theorem.Joel David Hamkins - 1999 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):264-272.
Co-stationarity of the Ground Model.Natasha Dobrinen & Sy-David Friedman - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (3):1029 - 1043.
The independence of δ1n.Amir Leshem & Menachem Magidor - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):350 - 362.
Some two-cardinal results for o-minimal theories.Timothy Bays - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (2):543-548.
Forcing isomorphism II.M. C. Laskowski & S. Shelah - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (4):1305-1320.
Blowing up the power set of the least measurable.Arthur W. Apter & James Cummings - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (3):915-923.
The bounded proper forcing axiom.Martin Goldstern & Saharon Shelah - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):58-73.
Spector forcing.J. M. Henle - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (2):542-554.
Extender based forcings.Moti Gitik & Menachem Magidor - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (2):445-460.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-24

Downloads
43 (#352,595)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Prikry forcing and tree Prikry forcing of various filters.Tom Benhamou - 2019 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 58 (7-8):787-817.
Intermediate models of Magidor-Radin forcing-Part II.Tom Benhamou & Moti Gitik - 2022 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 173 (6):103107.
Fresh function spectra.Vera Fischer, Marlene Koelbing & Wolfgang Wohofsky - 2023 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 174 (9):103300.
Non-homogeneity of quotients of Prikry forcings.Moti Gitik & Eyal Kaplan - 2019 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 58 (5-6):649-710.
On Cohen and Prikry Forcing Notions.Tom Benhamou & Moti Gitik - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-47.

Add more citations

References found in this work

[Omnibus Review].Thomas Jech - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):261-262.
Δ12-sets of reals.Jaime I. Ihoda & Saharon Shelah - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 42 (3):207-223.
The covering lemma for L[U].A. J. Dodd & R. B. Jensen - 1982 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 22 (2):127-135.
Boolean extensions and measurable cardinals.K. Kunen - 1971 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 2 (4):359.
DELTA ¹2-sets of reals.J. I. Ihoda - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 42 (3):207.

Add more references