Reciprocity and Liability Protections during the Covid‐19 Pandemic

Hastings Center Report 51 (3):5-7 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

During the Covid‐19 pandemic, as resources dwindled, clinicians, health care institutions, and policymakers have expressed concern about potential legal liability for following crisis standards of care (CSC) plans. Although there is no robust empirical research to demonstrate that liability protections actually influence physician behavior, we argue that limited liability protections for health care professionals who follow established CSC plans may instead be justified by reliance on the principle of reciprocity. Expecting physicians to do something they know will harm their patients causes moral distress and suffering that may leave lasting scars. Limited liability shields are both appropriate and proportionate to the risk physicians are being asked to take in such circumstances. Under certain narrow circumstances, it remains unclear that the standard of care is sufficiently flexible to protect physicians from liability. Given this uncertainty, the likelihood that physicians would be sued for such an act, and their desire for such immunity, this limited protection is morally legitimate.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,703

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

After COVID-19: The Way We Die from Now On.Anna Magdalena Elsner - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (1):69-72.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-26

Downloads
4 (#1,412,744)

6 months
2 (#650,101)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

COVID in NYC: What New York Did, and Should Have Done.Valerie Gutmann Koch & Susie A. Han - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (7):153-155.
Public health, ethical behavior and reciprocity.A. M. Viens - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (5):1 – 3.

Add more references