Ambiguous Interests: Maternal Desires and Fetal Interests

American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):31-33 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2015.1120795

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Philosophical Critique of the "Best Interests" Criterion and an Exploration of Clinical Ethical Strategies for Balancing the Interests of Infants or Fetuses, Family Members, and Society in the United States, India, and Sweden.Catherine Myser - 1994 - Dissertation, Georgetown University
Quality of Life and Elective C-Sections: Defining Limits to Maternal and Family Interests.Jeffrey P. Spike - 2012 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (3):252-255.
Ultrasound’s ‘window on the womb’ brings ethical challenges for balancing maternal and fetal health interests: obstetricians’ experiences in Australia.Kristina Edvardsson, Rhonda Small, Ann Lalos, Margareta Persson & Ingrid Mogren - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):31.
Altruism, self-interest and the indistinctness of persons.Keith Graham - 2002 - In Jonathan Seglow (ed.), Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. F. Cass Publishers. pp. 49-67.
Do Embryos Have Interests?: Why Embryos Are Identical to Future Persons but Not Harmed by Death.Aaron Simmons - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):57-66.
Is current practice around late termination of pregnancy eugenic and discriminatory? Maternal interests and abortion.J. Savulescu - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (3):165-171.
Two Arguments against Biological Interests.Aaron Simmons - 2010 - Environmental Ethics 32 (3):229-245.
To What Extent Does or Should a Woman's Autonomy Overrule the Interests of Her Baby? A Study of Autonomy-related Issues in the Context of Caesarean Section.Rebecca Brione - 2015 - The New Bioethics 21 (1):71-86.
Randomized Controlled Trials of Maternal‐Fetal Surgery: A Challenge to Clinical Equipoise.H. C. M. L. Rodrigues & P. P. van den Berg - 2012 - Bioethics 28 (8):405-413.
I feel what you think.Alfred Freddoso - manuscript
In Nature’s Interests: Interests, Animal Rights, and Environmental Ethics.Gary Edward Varner - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
I feel what you think.Heidi Maibom - unknown
Maternal-Fetal Surgery: The Fallacy of Abstraction and the Problem of Equipoise. [REVIEW]Anne Drapkin Lyerly & Mary Briody Mahowald - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (2):151-165.
Ethics and the generous ontology.Eric T. Olson - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (4):259-270.
Do Animal Have Interests Worthy of Our Moral Interest?Peter Miller - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (4):319-333.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-02

Downloads
24 (#617,476)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Koch
State University of New York (SUNY)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Morally relevant potential.David B. Hershenov & Rose J. Hershenov - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (3):268-271.

Add more references