An Alternative to an Alternative to Brain Death

Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:89-98 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I will provide a hylomorphic critique of Jeff McMahan’s “An Alternative to Brain Death.” I will evaluate three puzzles—the dicephalus, the braintransplant, and the split-brain phenomenon—proposed by McMahan which allow him to deny that a human being is identical to an organism. I will contend thatMcMahan’s solution entails counterintuitive consequences that pose problems to organ transplant cases. A Thomistic hylomorphic metaphysics not only avoids these unwelcome consequences and provides solutions to the three puzzles but in doing so allows for an alternative definition of death. Since McMahan has constructed his definition of death around his own metaphysics, alternative metaphysics, in this case a hylomorphic metaphysics, allow for an alternative definition of death.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Brain death without definitions.Winston Chiong - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (6):20-30.
The conservative use of the brain-death criterion – a critique.Tom Tomlinson - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (4):377-394.
Current debate on the ethical issues of brain death.Masahiro Morioka - 2004 - Proceedings of International Congress on Ethical Issues in Brain Death and Organ Transplantation:57-59.
The metaphysics of brain death.Jeff Mcmahan - 1995 - Bioethics 9 (2):91–126.
Death.James W. Evra - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-01

Downloads
75 (#200,005)

6 months
6 (#201,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Koch
Villanova University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references