Mezzo opaco, mezzo trasparente

Rivista di Estetica:113-118 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Taking into consideration two famous philosophical perspectives (Danto’s and Walton’s, respectively) on artistic categories (“style”, principally), this paper focuses on a peculiarity of Paladinos works: the robust interplay between their transparency (when taken as a medium) and the opaqueness of their contents (when taken as images).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,143

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-28

Downloads
26 (#929,316)

6 months
10 (#364,647)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pietro Kobau
Università degli Studi di Torino

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Categories of Art.Kendall L. Walton - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (3):334-367.
The Artworld.Arthur Danto - 1964 - Journal of Philosophy 61 (19):571-584.
Kendall Walton's 'categories of art': A critical commentary.Brian Laetz - 2010 - British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (3):287-306.
Danto, style, and intention.Noel Carroll - 1995 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (3):251-257.

Add more references