Social and Scientific Method or What Do We Make of the Distinction Between the Natural and the Social Sciences?

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 (3):335-359 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/004839318101100304

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Philosophy & methodology of the social sciences.Mark J. Smith (ed.) - 2005 - Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
The Essential Nature of the Method of the Natural Sciences: Response to A. T. Nuyen's "Truth, Method, and Objectivity: Husserl and Gadamer on Scientific Method".Joseph Becker - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):73-76.
Karl Popper's political philosophy of social science.Geoff Stokes - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (1):56-79.
Naturalistic hermeneutics.Chrysostomos Mantzavinos - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
What Happened? Are We Asking or Telling?Marvin E. Kirsh - manuscript
Natural science, social science, and democratic practice: Some political implications of the distinction between the natural and the human sciences.Marvin Stauch - 1992 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22 (3):337-356.
Social Life and Social Science: The Significance of the Naturalist/Intentionalist Dispute.Nancy C. M. Hartsock - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:325 - 345.
Objectivity in social science: Toward a hermeneutical evolutionary theory.Ricardo Waizbort - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):151-162.
Redescription and Descriptivism in the Social Sciences.Lee C. McIntyre - 2004 - Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):453 - 464.
Philosophy of the social sciences: philosophical theory and scientific practice.Chrysostomos Mantzavinos (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ian Hacking's Proposal for the Distinction between Natural and Social Sciences.María Laura Martínez - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):212-234.
Interactive Classification and Practice in the Social Sciences.Matt L. Drabek - 2010 - Poroi 6 (2):62-80.
Making social science matter: why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again.Bent Flyvbjerg - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-27

Downloads
24 (#642,030)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What does the double hermeneutic explain/justify?William Lynch - 1993 - Social Epistemology 7 (2):193 – 204.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Ontological relativity and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1969 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
A realist theory of science.Roy Bhaskar - 1975 - New York: Routledge.

View all 34 references / Add more references