Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):174-189 (2009)

Christopher Morgan-Knapp
State University of New York at Binghamton
abstract Most critics of species egalitarianism point to its counter‐intuitive implications in particular cases. But this argumentative strategy is vulnerable to the response that our intuitions should give way in the face of arguments showing that species egalitarianism is required by our deepest, most fundamental moral principles. In this article, I develop an argument against deontological versions of species egalitarianism on its own terms. Appealing to the fundamental moral ideal of proportionality, I show that deontological species egalitarianism is morally objectionable as a matter of principle: it is committed to treating two individuals who are extraordinarily similar in morally relevant respects drastically differently. I then illustrate how an inegalitarian account of moral standing might be incorporated into traditional moral theories in ways that make them far more promising as theories of our obligations to the non‐human world.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/japp.2009.26.issue-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,078
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Against Biospherical Egalitarianism.William C. French - 1995 - Environmental Ethics 17 (1):39-57.
Respect for Everything.David Schmidtz - 2011 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (2):127 - 138.
Intrinsic Value, Moral Standing, and Species.Rick O’Neil - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (1):45-52.
Species as a Relationship.Julia Tanner - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (4):337-347.
Biodiversity and All That Jazz.Alan Carter - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (1):58-75.
On the Metaphysics of Species.Judith K. Crane - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (2):156-173.
Biodiversity and All That Jazz.Alan Carter - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (1):58-75.
Why Do Species Matter?Lilly-Marlene Russow - 1981 - Environmental Ethics 3 (2):101-112.
Ecocentrism as Anthropocentrism.Martin Drenthen - 2011 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (2):151 - 154.
Equality Does Not Entail Equality Across Species.Roger Fjellstrom - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (4):339-352.
Species Equality and the Foundations of Moral Theory.James C. Anderson - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):347 - 365.


Added to PP index

Total views
54 ( #208,266 of 2,498,798 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,798 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes