Assessing Grading

Public Affairs Quarterly 21 (3):275-294 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper begins with a description of common grading practices at universities in the U.S., and analyzes the unfairness, injustice, and harm they produce. It then proposes a solution to these problems in the form of an alternative grading system: institutions should adopt a grading system that assesses students’ performance relative to the performance of their peers. That is, institutions should abolish the practice of attempting to assign grades that correspond to an absolute standard of intrinsic merit. Instead, our evaluation should simply communicate how the quality of a student’s work compares to the work submitted by other students in the class.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fair Grades.Daryl Close - 2009 - Teaching Philosophy 32 (4):361-398.
Grading Religions.Noriaki Iwasa - 2011 - Sophia 50 (1):189-209.
The Case for Motivational Grading.John Immerwahr - 2011 - Teaching Philosophy 34 (4):335-346.
On grading.J. O. Urmson - 1950 - Mind 59 (234):145-169.
Mr. Urmson on grading.M. J. Baker - 1951 - Mind 60 (240):530-535.
Grading, values, and choice.Charles A. Baylis - 1958 - Mind 67 (268):485-501.
Mr. Urmson on grading.Karl Britton - 1951 - Mind 60 (240):526-529.
On grading labels.Jerry S. Clegg - 1966 - Mind 75 (297):138-140.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-03

Downloads
69 (#231,631)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Morgan-Knapp
State University of New York at Binghamton

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references