Duties to assist others and political obligations

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):143-159 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In response to recent criticisms of traditional theories of political obligation, scholars have advanced moral reasons for complying with the law that focus on natural duties to assist other people who are in need. In discussions of political obligation, these ‘rescue principles’ are presented as alternatives to traditional principles. I argue that theories of political obligation based on rescue principles are not able to fulfill the role theorists assign them. If the underlying assumptions of rescue theories are uncovered, they can be seen also to support more traditional obligations to obey the law. Accordingly, rather than serving as alternatives to traditional principles, rescue principles can only supplement them. Key Words: political obligation • rescue • Copp.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
90 (#190,596)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Samaritanism and Civil Disobedience.Candice Delmas - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (3):295-313.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references