Strategic and Regulatory Approaches to Increasing Women in Leadership: Multilevel Targets and Mandatory Quotas as Levers for Cultural Change
Journal of Business Ethics 133 (3):395-419 (2016)
AbstractWhile substantial evidence is emerging internationally of positive increases in the participation of women on company boards, there is less evidence of any significant change in the proportion of women in senior executive ranks. This paper describes evidence of positive changes in the number of women on boards in Australia. Unfortunately these changes are not mirrored in the senior executive ranks where the proportion of women remains consistently low. We explore some of the reasons for these disproportionate changes and examine the likely effect of the recent amendments to the Australian stock exchange’s corporate governance code designed to improve gender diversity both on boards and throughout organisations. Based on the early corporate response to these regulatory changes, it is interesting to consider whether Australia’s approach in promoting voluntary self-regulation at the corporate level may be as effective in the long run as the emerging trend in Europe to apply legislated quotas for female corporate board representation. Interview evidence is presented suggesting that the primary reasons for the lack of women in leadership are not simply lack of opportunity at the apex of the corporation, but issues at mid-management level that are unlikely to be resolved by mandatory board quotas. In some circumstances carefully monitored voluntary targets may be more effective at promoting cultural and strategic change at the heart of the corporation. In summary, mandatory quotas may achieve early and significant results in terms of female board representation. However, voluntary targets for women’s participation on boards and in executive ranks may promote more effective cultural and practical change in support of greater representation of women in leadership.
Similar books and articles
Leadership and Change: The Case for Greater Ethical Clarity. [REVIEW]Bernard Burnes & Rune Todnem By - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 108 (2):239-252.
The Role of Integrity as a Mediator in Strategic Leadership: A Recipe for Reputational Capital. [REVIEW]Skip Worden - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 46 (1):31 - 44.
Do Perceptions of Ethical Conduct Matter During Organizational Change? Ethical Leadership and Employee Involvement.Monica M. Sharif & Terri A. Scandura - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 124 (2):1-12.
Spirituality and Strategic Leadership: The Influence of Spiritual Beliefs on Strategic Decision Making. [REVIEW]Kelly A. Phipps - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 106 (2):177-189.
How Ethical Leadership Influence Employees' Innovative Work Behavior: A Perspective of Intrinsic Motivation. [REVIEW]Tu Yidong & Lu Xinxin - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 116 (2):441-455.
Changing State Feminism.Johanna Kantola & Joyce Outshoorn - 2007 - In Joyce Outshoorn & Johanna Kantola (eds.), Changing State Feminism. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Women's Rights and Cultural Differences.Shari Stone-Mediatore - 2004 - Studies in Practical Philosophy 4 (2):111-133.
Public Relations Leadership in Corporate Social Responsibility.Suzanne Benn, Lindi Renier Todd & Jannet Pendleton - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (3):403 - 423.
Cultural Exchange in a Heterogeneous Research Field: Approaching Scienti?C Culture with Anthropological Thought.Daniela Baus - 2009 - Spontaneous Generations 3 (1):95-104.
Legal, Regulatory and Ethical Dimensions of Mandatory Clinical Trial Registration.Ron A. Bouchard - manuscript
The Evolution of Non-Market Strategies in a Changing Regulatory Environment.Mika Skippari & Päivi Holmlund - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:412-415.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Does Confucianism Reduce Board Gender Diversity? Firm-Level Evidence From China.Xingqiang Du - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 136 (2):399-436.
Leadership: Philosophical Perspectives and Qualitative Analysis of Ethics—Looking Back, Looking Forward, Looking Around.Karianne Kalshoven & Scott Taylor - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 148 (1):1-3.
Women Directors and Corporate Social Performance: An Integrative Review of the Literature and a Future Research Agenda.Giovanna Campopiano, Patricia Gabaldón & Daniela Gimenez-Jimenez - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics.
A Rights-Based Approach to Board Quotas and How Hard Sanctions Work for Gender Equality.Kate Clayton-Hathway, Elisabeth K. Kelan & Anne Laure Humbert - 2019 - European Journal of Women's Studies 26 (4):447-468.
The Carrot or the Stick: Self-Regulation for Gender-Diverse Boards Via Codes of Good Governance.Heike Mensi-Klarbach, Stephan Leixnering & Michael Schiffinger - 2021 - Journal of Business Ethics 170 (3):577-593.
References found in this work
Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass. [REVIEW]Mariateresa Torchia, Andrea Calabrò & Morten Huse - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (2):299-317.
The Governance of Corporate Sustainability: Empirical Insights Into the Development, Leadership and Implementation of Responsible Business Strategy.Alice Klettner, Thomas Clarke & Martijn Boersma - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 122 (1):1-21.
Women and Employee-Elected Board Members, and Their Contributions to Board Control Tasks.Morten Huse, Sabina Tacheva Nielsen & Inger Marie Hagen - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4):581-597.
The Gender Quota and Female Leadership: Effects of the Norwegian Gender Quota on Board Chairs and CEOs. [REVIEW]Mingzhu Wang & Elisabeth Kelan - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3):449-466.
Building Better Theory by Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide.Sonali K. Shah & Kevin G. Corley - manuscript