Decisions and the Evolution of Memory: Multiple Systems, Multiple Functions

Psychological Review 109:306-329 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Memory evolved to supply useful, timely information to the organism’s decision-making systems. Therefore, decision rules, multiple memory systems, and the search engines that link them should have coevolved to mesh in a coadapted, functionally interlocking way. This adaptationist perspective suggested the scope hypothesis: When a generalization is retrieved from semantic memory, episodic memories that are inconsistent with it should be retrieved in tandem to place boundary conditions on the scope of the generalization. Using a priming paradigm and a decision task involving person memory, the authors tested and confirmed this hypothesis. The results support the view that priming is an evolved adaptation. They further show that dissociations between memory systems are not—and should not be—absolute: Independence exists for some tasks but not others.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Multiple Memory Systems: What and Why.Lynn Nadel - 1992 - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 4:179-188.
On Unifying Declarative Memory.Tomy Ames - 2019 - Dissertation, University of Missouri, St. Louis
Memory Systems and the Mnemic Character of Procedural Memory.Jonathan Najenson - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-22

Downloads
4,166 (#1,500)

6 months
246 (#10,382)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stanley Bernard Klein
University of California, Santa Barbara

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references