Nature or Providence? On the Theoretical and Moral Importance of Kant’s Philosophy of History

American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75 (2):201-219 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Kant’s use of the terms ‘Nature’ and ‘Providence’ in his essays on history has long puzzled commentators. Kant personifies Nature and Providence in a curious way, by speaking of them as “deciding” to give humankind certain predispositions, “wanting” these to be developed, and “knowing” what is best for humans Moreover, he leaves the relationship between the two terms unclear. In this essay, I argue that Kant’s use of ‘Nature’ and ‘Providence’ can be clarified and explained. Moreover, I show that Kant’s use of the terms is symptomatic of a much more important and not sufficiently appreciated fact about Kant’s philosophy of history, viz., that it fulfils a function in both his theoretical and his practical philosophy.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,916

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant, History, and the Idea of Moral Development.Pauline Kleingeld - 1999 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 16 (1):59-80.
Providence Lost.Genevieve Lloyd - 2008 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Anthropology, History, and Education.Immanuel Kant - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant's "naturalistic" history of mankind? Some reservations.John Zammito - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (1):29-62.


Added to PP

252 (#51,278)

6 months
22 (#61,121)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pauline Kleingeld
University of Groningen

References found in this work

Kant's Theory of History and Progress.Louis Dupré - 1998 - Review of Metaphysics 51 (4):813 - 828.
8. Von der Garantie des ewigen Friedens.Pierre Laberge - 1995 - In Otfried Höffe (ed.), Immanuel Kant, Zum Ewigen Frieden. De Gruyter. pp. 149-170.

Add more references