Nieuwe argumenten tegen de toeschrijving Van het auteurschap Van de „stelkonstige reeckening Van den regenboog” en „reeckening Van kanssen” aan Spinoza

Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 47 (3):493 - 502 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX


An accurate analysis of the text shows that the small treatises have a logical structure and a style which is in all aspects unspinozistic. The main points of difference are : a formalistic interpretation of mathematics‚ the opposition between mathematics and physics‚ slavish cartesianism‚ the presence of numerous pleonasms‚ carelessness of expression‚ parade of learning‚ prolixity‚ attention for irrelevant qualities of authors quoted‚ educational purpose. Together with De Vet’s demonstration that the author of SRR and RK is still alive in 1693 (see Tijdschr. v. Filosofie 45‚ 1983) these arguments force us‚ to consign Spinoza’s authorship‚ recently still defended by Petry a.o.‚ to the realm of fancy



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Spinoza: kernmomenten in zijn denken.F. D. A. Vleeskens (ed.) - 1977 - Baarn: Het Wereldvenster.
De nieuwe kleren van de filosoof: over het nut en nadeel van de experimentele filosofie.Tim De Mey - 2010 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 102 (1):59-68.


Added to PP

60 (#275,302)

6 months
5 (#710,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references