Multiple realizability and the semantic view of theories

Philosophical Studies 163 (3):683-695 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Multiply realizable properties are those whose realizers are physically diverse. It is often argued that theories which contain them are ipso facto irreducible. These arguments assume that physical explanations are restricted to the most specific descriptions possible of physical entities. This assumption is descriptively false, and philosophically unmotivated. I argue that it is a holdover from the late positivist axiomatic view of theories. A semantic view of theories, by contrast, correctly allows scientific explanations to be couched in the most perspicuous, powerful language available. On a semantic view, traditional notions of multiple realizability are thus very hard to motivate. At best, one must abandon either the idea that multiple realizability is an interesting scientific notion, or else admit that multiply realizable properties do not automatically block scientific reductions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What multiple realizability does not show.Robert Francescotti - 1997 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 18 (1):13-28.
Multiple Realizability.Ronald P. Endicott - 2005 - In D. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd edition. Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference.
Connectionism, reduction, and multiple realizability.John Bickle - 1995 - Behavior and Philosophy 23 (2):29-39.
Dynamics, Brandom-style.Bernhard Nickel - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):333-354.
A liberal conception of multiple realizability.Eric Funkhouser - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (3):467-494.
Multiple realizability.Eric Funkhouser - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (2):303–315.
European Functionalism.Sven Rosenkranz - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):229 - 249.
What’s Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?John Beatty - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:397 - 426.
Multiple realizability and psychophysical reduction.John Bickle - 1992 - Behavior and Philosophy 20 (1):47-58.
What Scientific Theories Could Not Be.Hans Halvorson - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (2):183-206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-06

Downloads
198 (#97,367)

6 months
22 (#118,956)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Colin Klein
Australian National University

References found in this work

The Language of Thought.Jerry A. Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.
Studies in the way of words.Herbert Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Explaining the brain: mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience.Carl F. Craver - 2007 - New York : Oxford University Press,: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.

View all 33 references / Add more references