Agency, Character and the Real Failure of Consequentialism

Auslegung 23 (1):1-34 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Certain consequentialists have responded to deontological worries regarding personal projects or options and agent-centered restrictions or constraints by pointing out that it is consistent with consequentialist principles that people develop within themselves, dispositions to act with such things in mind, even if doing so does not lead to the best consequences on every occasion. This paper argues that making this response requires shifting the focus of moral evaluation off of evaluation of individual actions and towards evaluation of whole character traits and patterns of behavior. However, this weds consequentialism to a sort of psychological determinism, with which it is incompatible, because it makes any sort of assessment in terms of right or wrong incoherent. The paper concludes by sketching an ethical theory that abandons right and wrong as its organizing concepts, but nevertheless preserves much of the spirit of consequentialism. Relationships between whole patterns of behavior and the production of good and bad consequences can be studied and analyzed, and this information can be used to improve society and ourselves, without it being required that any individual persons acts or dispositions to behave be evaluated as right or wrong.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-11

Downloads
145 (#119,503)

6 months
79 (#48,277)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin Klement
University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references