Objectivity and Perspectival Content

Erkenntnis 87 (1):137-159 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is objectivity? What would it take to have objective representations and do we have what it takes? This paper aims to contribute to answering these questions. To this end, it isolates one relevant sense of objectivity and proposes a generalization of standard frameworks of representational content in order to engage with the question in a way that is rhetorically fair. Armed with a general conception of perspectival content, taken from the literature on centred or de se content, the paper articulates one necessary condition for objective representation: the possession of objective concepts and therefore objective contents. Two ways of meeting this condition are discussed in an exploratory way.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does Perceptual Content Have to Be Objective? A Defence of Nonconceptualism.Eva Schmidt - 2015 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (1):201-214.
Perspectival representation and fallacies in metaethics.Max Kölbel - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (3-4):379-404.
The Objectivity of Science.Howard Sankey - 2023 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 17 (45):1-10.
Formulating Moral Objectivity.Elizabeth Tropman - 2018 - Philosophia 46 (4):1023-1040.
Brandom on Norms and Objectivity.Leonardo Marchettoni - 2018 - Critical Horizons 19 (3):215-232.
Truth Without Objectivity.Max Kölbel - 2002 - London and New York: Routledge.
Burge’s Defense of Perceptual Content.Todd Ganson, Ben Bronner & Alex Kerr - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (3):556-573.
A Criterion for Objectivity.Max Kölbel - 2000 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 15 (2):209-228.
Objectivity, information, and Maxwell's demon.Steven Weinstein - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1245-1255.
Why are some moral beliefs perceived to be more objective than others.Geoffrey Goodwin & John M. Darley - 2012 - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48 (1):250-256.
Objectivity and the Rule of Law.Matthew H. Kramer - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-31

Downloads
104 (#164,377)

6 months
25 (#111,582)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Max Kölbel
University of Vienna

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Origins of Objectivity.Tyler Burge - 2010 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The View From Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Situations and attitudes.Jon Barwise & John Perry - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy 78 (11):668-691.
Truth and objectivity.Crispin Wright - 1992 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

View all 89 references / Add more references