Contemporary Legal Philosophy in Germany

Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 93 (4):519-539 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article gives a concise overview on developments in German legal philosophy since 1990. After briefly sketching the previous streams, dating back to 1945, it focuses on current tendencies and topics. Three main debates are reported in detail, namely the debates on the structure of legal argumentation, on the structure of the legal system, and on Radbruch’s Formula. This includes, inter alia, Robert Alexy’s new theory of balancing as well as the debate on the role of logic in legal reasoning. Overall, the article introduces the main protagonists and schools as well as their respective advantages, drawbacks, and challenges.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The autonomy of law: essays on legal positivism.Robert P. George (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited.Fernando Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
Legal reasoning and legal theory revisited.Fernando Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism.Robert P. George (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.
Legal Certainty and Correctness.Robert Alexy - 2015 - Ratio Juris 28 (4):441-451.
An Empire of Light?: II: Learning and Lawmaking in Germany Today.Stefan Vogenauer - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (4):627-663.
Legal pluralism.Margaret Davies - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

18 (#703,405)

6 months
3 (#433,312)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references