A Conflict Between Some Semantic Conditions of Carmo and Jones for Contrary-to-Duty Obligations

Studia Logica 105 (1):173-178 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show that Carmo and Jones’ condition 5 conflicts with the other conditions on their models for contrary-to-duty obligations. We then propose a resolution to the conflict.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contrary-to-duty obligations.Henry Prakken & Marek Sergot - 1996 - Studia Logica 57 (1):91 - 115.
Changing the modal context.John Cantwell - 2008 - Theoria 74 (4):331-351.
Moral action, ignorance of fact, and inability.Daniel Kading - 1965 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 25 (3):333-355.
Reproductive Reasons and Procreative Duty.James McBain - 2013 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):67-74.
The Value of Duty.David Owens - 2012 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):199-215.
The Obligations of Transnational Corporations.Nien-hê Hsieh - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (4):643-661.
Normative Requirements and Contrary-to-Duty Obligations.Juan Comesaña - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy 112 (11):600-626.
Natural enemies: An anatomy of environmental conflict.David Schmidtz - 2000 - Environmental Ethics 22 (4):397-408.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-02

Downloads
13 (#886,512)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
University of Hawaii

References found in this work

Counterfactuals and comparative possibility.David Lewis - 1973 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (4):418-446.
Chisholm's Paradox and Conditional Oughts.Catharine Saint Croix & Richmond Thomason - 2014 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8554:192-207.

Add more references