Conversations About Responsible Nanoresearch

NanoEthics 5 (1):99-113 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is currently a strong focus on responsible research in relation to the development of nanoscience and nanotechnology. This study presents a series of conversations with nanoresearchers, with the ‘European Commission recommendation on a code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research’ (EC-CoC) as its point of departure. Six types of reactions to the document are developed, illustrating the diversity existing within the scientific community in responses towards this kind of new approaches to governance. Three broad notions of responsible nanoresearch are presented. The article concludes by arguing that while the suggestion put forward in the EC-CoC brings the concept of responsible nanoresearch a long way, one crucial element is to be wanted, namely responsible nanoresearch as increased awareness of moral choices

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Making our own luck.David Hodgson - 2007 - Ratio 20 (3):278–292.
Holding others responsible.Coleen Macnamara - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 152 (1):81-102.
Responsible Leadership as Virtuous Leadership.Kim Cameron - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 98 (S1):25-35.
Responsibility for the Future.Joel Feinberg - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:93-113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-04-06

Downloads
26 (#595,031)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The human condition [selections].Hannah Arendt - 2013 - In Timothy C. Campbell & Adam Sitze (eds.), Biopolitics: A Reader. Durham: Duke University Press.
Science, Faith and Society.Michael Polanyi - 1964 - University of Chicago Press.
Science, Faith and Society.Michael Polanyi - 1949 - Ethics 59 (4):271-284.

View all 9 references / Add more references