Visual argumentation in an Al Gore keynote presentation on climate change
Abstract
The use of digital presentation tools such as PowerPoint is ubiquitous; however we still do not know much about the persuasiveness of these programs. Examining the use of visual analogy and visual chronology, in particular, this paper explores the use of visual argumentation in a Keynote presentation by Al Gore. It illustrates how images function as an integrated part of Gores reasoning.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Strategies of Visual Argumentation in Slideshow Presentations: The Role of the Visuals in an Al Gore Presentation on Climate Change. [REVIEW]Jens E. Kjeldsen - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (4):425-443.
Virtues of visual argumentation: How pictures make the importance and strength of an argument salient.Jens E. Kjeldsen - unknown
The Rhetoric of Thick Representation: How Pictures Render the Importance and Strength of an Argument Salient.Jens E. Kjeldsen - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (2):197-215.
The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation.Jens E. Kjeldsen - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (2):115-132.
Visual tropes and figures as visual argumentation.Jens Kjeldsen - 2011 - In Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, David Godden & Gordon Mitchell (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Rozenberg / Sic Sat. pp. 567--576.
Seeing Reasons: Visual Argumentation in Advertisements. [REVIEW]Christina Slade - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (2):145-160.
Categorizing Visual Argumentation Processes: Visual commonplaces in civic culture.Maceio Ilon Lauer - unknown
Visual awareness of properties.Matthew J. Kennedy - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):298–325.
Argumentation, the visual, and the possibility of refutation: An exploration.Randall A. Lake & Barbara A. Pickering - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (1):79-93.
Should Visual Arguments be Propositional in Order to be Arguments?Georges Roque - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (2):177-195.
Images as Arguments: Progress and Problems, a Brief Commentary.David Godden - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (2):235-238.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-04-02
Downloads
12 (#806,664)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
2015-04-02
Downloads
12 (#806,664)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren, Erik Bart Garssen, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans C. W. Krabbe, Jean Bart Verheij & H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
References found in this work
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1969 - Notre Dame, IN, USA: Notre Dame University Press.
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman - 1969 - Notre Dame, [Ind.]University of Notre Dame Press.
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Ch Perelman, L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, John Wilkinson & Purcell Weaver - 1969 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (4):249-254.
An Introduction to Reasoning.Stephen Toulmin, Richard D. Rieke & Allan Janik - 1979 - New York and London: Macmillan.