Oup Usa (1993)
Abstract |
In this innovative study Patricia Kitcher argues that we can only understand the deduction of the categories in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason in terms of his attempt to fathom the psychological prerequisites of thought. Thus a consideration of his conception of psychology is essential to an understanding of his philosophy. Kitcher specifically considers Kant's claims about the unity of the thinking self; the spatial forms of human perceptions; the relations among mental states necessary for them to have content; the relations between perceptions and judgment; and the limits of philosophical insight into psychological processes.
|
Keywords | Kant, Immanuel Cognition |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 1994 |
Buy this book | Amazon page |
ISBN(s) | 9780195085631 0195085639 0195059670 |
DOI | 10.2307/2185939 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Natural and the Normative: Theories of Spatial Perception From Kant to Helmholtz.Gary Carl Hatfield - 1990 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
The Sensory Core and the Medieval Foundations of Early Modern Perceptual Theory.Gary Hatfield & William Epstein - 1979 - Isis 70 (3):363-384.
Citations of this work BETA
Two Kinds of Self‐Knowledge.Matthew Boyle - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (1):133-164.
Kant on the Object-Dependence of Intuition and Hallucination.Andrew Stephenson - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (260):486-508.
On the Transcendental Freedom of the Intellect.Colin McLear - 2020 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 7:35-104.
View all 76 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
The Apriority of the Starting‐Point of Kant's Transcendental Epistemology.Vasilis Politis - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):255 – 284.
Is Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose?Anil Gomes - 2010 - Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Kant's Transcendental Imagination.Gary Banham - 2005 - London, Houndmills and New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
How Does Kant Prove That We Perceive, and Not Merely Imagine, Physical Objects?Kenneth R. Westphal - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (4):781 - 806.
Affinity, Idealism and Naturalism: The Stability of Cinnabar and the Possibility of Experience.Kenneth R. Westphal - 1997 - Kant-Studien 88 (2):139-189.
Epistemic Reflection and Cognitive Reference in Kant's Transcendental Response to Skepticism.Kenneth R. Westphal - 2003 - Kant Studien 94 (2):135-171.
Some Differences Between Kant’s and Husserl’s Conceptions of Transcendental Philosophy.Thomas J. Nenon - 2008 - Continental Philosophy Review 41 (4):427-439.
Questions About Functionalism in Kant's Philosophy of Mind: Lessons for Cognitive Science.Matt McCormick - 2003 - Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 15 (2):255-266.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-01-31
Total views
82 ( #141,446 of 2,505,154 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,040 of 2,505,154 )
2012-01-31
Total views
82 ( #141,446 of 2,505,154 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,040 of 2,505,154 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads