The Limits to Setting Limits on Critical-Care Delivery: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Balancing Legitimate Critical-Care Interests: Setting Defensible Care Limits Through Policy Development”

American Journal of Bioethics 16 (1):5-8 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Critical-care decision making is highly complex, given the need for health care providers and organizations to consider, and constructively respond to, the diverse interests and perspectives of a variety of legitimate stakeholders. Insights derived from an identified set of ethics-related considerations have the potential to meaningfully inform inclusive and deliberative policy development that aims to optimally balance the competing obligations that arise in this challenging, clinical decision-making domain. A potential, constructive outcome of such policy engagement is the collaborative development of an as-fair-as-possible dispute resolution process that incorporates an appropriated-justified, defensible critical-care obligation threshold.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Of rescue and responsibility: Learning to live with limits.E. Haavi Morreim - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (5):455-470.
Ethical challenges in critical care medicine: A chinese perspective.Yali Cong - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (6):581 – 600.
Mind the gap! Three approaches to scarcity in health care.Yvonne Denier - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (1):73-87.
Critical Care Limits: What Is the Right Balance?Leonard Fleck - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (1):48-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-07

Downloads
42 (#364,808)

6 months
5 (#592,531)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile