Reply to Goff on physicalism

Ratio 21 (1):106–112 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9329.2007.00388.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Strict implication, supervenience, and physicalism.Robert Kirk - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (2):244-57.
Non-reductive physicalism?A. D. Smith - 1993 - In Howard M. Robinson (ed.), Objections to Physicalism. Oxford University Press.
Physicalism lives.Robert Kirk - 1996 - Ratio 9 (1):85-89.
Reply to Don Locke on zombies and materialism.Robert Kirk - 1977 - Mind 86 (April):262-4.
Physicalism and the First-Person Point of View: A Reply To Taliaferro and Goetz.Andrew Melnyk - 2007 - God or Blind Nature? Philosophers Debate the Evidence.
A problem with perspectival physicalism: A reply to Tye.Abe Witonsky - 2005 - Philosophia 32 (1-4):285-293.
Reply to professor Fodor on physicalism.Alan Zaitchik - 1981 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (December):294-295.
A posteriori physicalists get our phenomenal concepts wrong.Philip Goff - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):191 - 209.
The prospects for Kirk's non-reductive physicalism.Andrew Melnyk - 1998 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):323-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
35 (#443,848)

6 months
11 (#226,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Kirk
University of Ulster

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references