Misreading the Unparticipated Source of Difference in Deleuze's Reversal of Platonism

Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (1):205-225 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I argue that in his “reversal of Platonism” in The Logic of Sense, Gilles Deleuze does not adequately consider in what sense Plotinus identifies The One as “unparticipated.” I further claim that when The One is understood in the sense I consider Plotinus to have presented it, it shows itself to have attributes similar to Deleuze’s “dark precursor,” insofar as both The One and the dark precursor are ineffable, are inexhaustible, and contain absolute generative power. I propose that examining conceptual similarities between the works of such figures—about whose concepts similarity is undoubtedly counter-intuitive—sheds interesting light on important characteristics of Platonism, and in particular about the underappreciated sense in which the concept of difference is richly developed in the Platonic tradition

Similar books and articles

The Cambridge companion to Deleuze.Daniel W. Smith & Henry Somers-Hall (eds.) - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
3 The Deleuzian reversal of Platonism.Miguel de Beistegui - 2012 - In Daniel W. Smith & Henry Somers-Hall (eds.), The Cambridge companion to Deleuze. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Events of Difference.Keith Robinson - 2003 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (1):141-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
93 (#181,115)

6 months
61 (#70,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregory Kirk
Northern Arizona University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references