Monash Bioethics Review 26 (4):21-35 (2007)

Psychopathology can render people strange and difficult to understand. Communication can lead to empathic understanding, which in turn can guide compassionate action. But communication depends on a shared conceptual world. How can language convey meanings that are not shared, that mark a divide between human beings or whole communities? A consideration of the poetics of Paul Celan sheds light on the power of language to bridge disparate worlds and on the ethical stance needed when empathy fails. Celan’s poetics of alterity has implications for our efforts to understand individuals’ illness experience as a grounding for the ethics of the clinical encounter.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/bf03351290
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Multicultural Medicine and the Politics of Recognition.L. J. Kirmayer - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):410-423.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
12 ( #808,968 of 2,505,145 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,145 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes