Maintaining Continuity through a Scientific Revolution

Isis 98 (3):468-488 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


ABSTRACT A rereading of the American scientific literature on sex determination from 1902 to 1926 leads to a different understanding of the construction of the Mendelian‐chromosome theory after 1910. There was significant intellectual continuity, which has not been properly appreciated, underlying this scientific “revolution.” After reexamining the relationship between the ideas of key scientists, in particular Edmund B. Wilson and Thomas Hunt Morgan, I argue that, contrary to the historical literature, Wilson and Morgan did not adopt opposing views on Mendelism and sex determination. Rather, each preferred a non‐Mendelian explanation of the determination of sex. Around 1910, both integrated the Mendelian and non‐Mendelian theories to create a synthetic theory. One problem was the need to avoid an overly deterministic view of sex while also accepting the validity of Mendelism. Morgan’s discovery of mutations on the X chromosome takes on different significance when set in the context of the debate about sex determination, and Calvin Bridges’s work on sex determination is better seen as a development of Morgan’s ideas, rather than a departure from them. Conclusions point to the role of synthesis within fields as a way to advance scientific theories and reflect on the relationship between synthesis and explanatory “pluralism” in biology.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Continuity of Scientific Revolution.V. Shekawat - 1977 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 4 (4):495-512.
Characterising Near Continuity Constructively.Douglas Bridges & Luminiţa Vîţă - 2001 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (4):535-538.
Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Continuity, stability and community in teaching.J. F. Donnelly - 2006 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (3):311–325.
Is there an incommensurability between superseding theories?A. Polikarov - 1993 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):127 - 146.
Rethinking the Scientific Revolution.Margaret J. Osler (ed.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.


Added to PP

9 (#1,260,220)

6 months
5 (#648,618)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Anticoagulant factor V: Factors affecting the integration of novel scientific discoveries into the broader framework.Michelle L. LaBonte - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47:23-34.
Thomas Hunt Morgan and the invisible gene: the right tool for the job.Giulia Frezza & Mauro Capocci - 2018 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (2):31.

Add more citations