How not to structure a social theory: A reply to a critical response

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):464-479 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his recent review of my book, The Structure of Social Theory , Karsten Stueber rejected my criticisms of contemporary social theory. Against my "hermeneutic" sociology which prioritizes human social relations, he advocates a return to a dualistic ontology of structure and agency. This reply addresses Stueber’s criticisms to re-affirm the ontology of social relations against ontological dualism. Key Words: structure • agency • hermeneutics • social relations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,623

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#321,501)

6 months
8 (#531,034)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

For emergence: Refining Archer's account of social structure.Dave Elder-Vass - 2007 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (1):25–44.
Social structure and social relations.Dave Elder-Vass - 2007 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (4):463–477.
The Agency/Structure Dilemma: A Coordination Solution.Jiří Kabele - 2010 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40 (3):314-338.
The impossibility of finitism: from SSK to ESK?David Tyfield - 2008 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 1 (1):61.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions.David Bloor - 1997 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (2):400-401.
The sociology of philosophies: A précis.Randall Collins - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (2):157-201.

View all 8 references / Add more references