Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 35 (2):147-162 (2012)

Authors
Katherina Kinzel
Utrecht University
Abstract
History Without Causality. How Contemporary Historical Epistemology Demarcates Itself From the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Contemporary proponents of historical epistemology often try to delimit their enterprise by demarcating it from the sociology of scientific knowledge and other sociologically oriented approaches in the history of science. Their criticism is directed against the use of causal explanations which are deemed to invite reductionism and lead to a totalizing perspective on science. In the present article I want to analyse this line of criticism in what I consider are two paradigmatic works of contemporary historical epistemology: Lorraine Daston's und Peter Galison's Objectivity and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger's Toward a History of Epistemic Things. I first present their arguments against the sociological and causal analysis of scientific knowledge and practice and then try to defend sociological work in the history of science against their charges. I will, however, not do so by defending causal explanations directly. Rather, I will show that the arguments against sociological analysis put forward in contemporary historical epistemology, as well as historical epistemology's own models of historical explanation and narration, bear problematic consequences. I argue that Daston, Galison and Rheinberger fail to create productive resonances between macro- and microhistorical perspectives, that they reproduce an internalist picture of scientific knowledge, and finally that Rheinberger's attempt to deconstruct the dichotomy between subject and object leads him to neglect questions about the political dimension of scientific research
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1002/bewi.201201551
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Objectivity and Historiography.Martin Kusch - 2009 - Isis 100 (1):127-131.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Vom Nutzen der Historie für die Wissenschaftsphilosophie.Jutta Schickore - 2013 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 36 (1):83-93.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Plea for a Historical Epistemology of Research.Hans-Jörg Rheinberger - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):105-111.
Toward a Sociology of Epistemic Things.David Bloor - 2005 - Perspectives on Science 13 (3):285-312.
Hacking’s Historical Epistemology: A Critique of Styles of Reasoning.Martin Kusch - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):158-173.
Fleck and the Social Constitution of Scientific Objectivity.Melinda B. Fagan - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (4):272-285.
Wissenschaftsgeschichte und Ur- und Frühgeschichte.Mathias Wiegert - 1995 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 18 (3):181-185.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-04

Total views
13 ( #765,504 of 2,498,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes