Did Marx hold a labor theory of value?
Abstract
In the first volume of Capital, Marx introduces a labor theory of value. The theory is supposed to form the basis of his “laying bare” the “inner workings” of capitalism. The theory rests on two claims, and at the outset Marx uses it to explain four features of capitalist production. Yet by the end of the final volume of Capital, he abandons both claims and offers alternative accounts of all four features of capitalism. We hold that Marx’s introduction of the labor theory of value is not the presentation of an alternative economic theory, but serves to introduce his analysis of the class structure of capitalismAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Marx, Engels, and the idea of exploitation.Greg Godels - 1997 - Nature, Society, and Thought 10 (4):509--522.
Marxian Value Theory and the Labor — Labor Power Distinction.Gilbert L. Skillman - 1996 - Science and Society 60 (4):427 - 451.
Value, Capital and Nature: Some Ecological Implications of Marx's Critique of Political Economy.Paul Burkett - 1996 - Science and Society 60 (3):332 - 359.
Marx and the Objectivity of Science.Peter Railton - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:813 - 826.
Marx on money and crises.Frank Vorhies - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (3-4):531-541.
Value theory and the "golden eggs": Appropriating the magic of accumulation.Michael W. Macy - 1988 - Sociological Theory 6 (2):131-152.
Marx's embryology of society.Arno Wouters - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (2):149-179.
Marx and Cohen on exploitation and the labor theory of value.Nancy Holmstrom - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):287 – 307.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
109 (#115,837)
6 months
3 (#226,063)
2009-01-28
Downloads
109 (#115,837)
6 months
3 (#226,063)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Abstract.[author unknown] - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (2):319-325.