Reason, tradition, and authority: a comparative study of Habermas and Gadamer

Abstract

This thesis explores the possibilities for normative grounding of authority through a focus on the relationship between Habermas’s ‘critical theory’ and Gadamer’s ‘philosophical hermeneutics’, with particular reference to the bases of authority in East Asian culture. More specifically, it examines the role of reason and tradition in justifying political authority. Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics locates the conditions of authority in tradition, constituted in part by prejudice, while Habermas offers a theory of communicative action that transcends the limited horizons of tradition. The distinction between reason and tradition is applied in East Asian culture through an analysis of the practice of filial piety. The thesis endorses Habermas’s charge that Gadamer hypostatizes tradition. Habermas correctly identifies the political implication of Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, namely, that it obscures power relations. It is argued that Habermas’s ‘communicative action theory’ and ‘discourse ethics’ are better able to do justice to the basis for the normative grounding of authority. The relevance of discourse ethics for the justification of political authority in East Asian culture is explored

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Gadamer and political authority.George Duke - 2014 - European Journal of Political Theory 13 (1):25-40.
Tradition and Dialogue in Gadamer, Heidegger and Habermas.Devrim Sezer - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:105-110.
A response to Richard Wolin on Gadamer and the nazis.Richard E. Palmer - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (4):467 – 482.
Confucian ethics and the critique of ideology.Alan K. L. Chan - 2000 - Asian Philosophy 10 (3):245 – 261.
Reconstructing theory: Gadamer, Habermas, Luhmann.David Roberts (ed.) - 1995 - Carlton South, Vic., Australia: Melbourne University Press.
Objectivism in hermeneutics? Gadamer, Habermas, Dilthey.Austin Harrington - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (4):491-507.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-02

Downloads
54 (#283,495)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references