Medizinische Werte des Hippokratismus und Wertfreiheit der Biomedizin

Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 5:85-92 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Hippocratism formulated the fundamental principles of medical action. It also includes the mental attitude of the doctor. The central point of medical postulate is the benefit to end suffering. The responsibility of the doctor contains the medical art as a foreground, and the ethical attitude of the physician as a background. The medical art is the purpose and the provision of medicine, and applies in all areas to sick people. The key points are the veneration of ethical values and the full respect for the life of the individual. The Hippocratic values are based on the medical art and on the ethical attitude of the doctor and thus embody humanity. The transformation of high industrialized and pluralistic society led to changes in the basic ethical stance and the value awareness of thescientific world. The Biomedical sciences present the variety of ways using the freedom of research. The Biomedical technology and its applications, such as gene therapy, research on embryos and reproductive cloning, develop new ideas and their implementation for the people. The Biomedical sciences tend to Wertfreiheit. As a consequence the real output values of medicine are in question. At present, the Biomedical sciences are opposed to ethics because of their bold attempts in research. The consensus between medicine and ethics is a necessity, because ethics are a point of support of medicine.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Biomedical ethics.Walter Glannon - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Medical ethics in Poland.Jan Doroszewski - 1988 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 9 (3).
Responsible conduct of research.Adil E. Shamoo - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David B. Resnik.
Research ethics.Ana Smith Iltis (ed.) - 2006 - London: Routledge.
The professional autonomy of the medical doctor in italy.Dario Sacchini & Leonardo Antico - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (5):441-456.
Pragmatic bioethics.Glenn McGee (ed.) - 1999 - Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Making sense of medical ethics: a hands-on guide.Alan G. Johnson - 2006 - New York: Distributed in the U.S.A. by Oxford University Press. Edited by Paul R. V. Johnson.
Research on human subjects: ethics, law, and social policy.David N. Weisstub (ed.) - 1998 - Kidlington, Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
16 (#855,572)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references