AI and Society 28 (3):309-318 (2013)
AbstractRobot enthusiasts envision robots will become a “race unto themselves” as they cohabit with the humankind one day. Profound questions arise surrounding one of the major areas of research in the contemporary world—that concerning artificial intelligence. Fascination and anxiety that androids impose upon us hinges on how we come to conceive of the “Cultural Other.” Applying the notion of the “other” in multicultural research process, we will explore how the “Other” has been used to illustrate values and theories about robots, as a mirror for the self. In this paper, we focus on the social, cultural, and religious implications of humans’ attitudes toward relationships between humans with robots. Six major views on humanoid robots are proposed: (1) robots as the “Frightening Other,” (2) robots as the “Subhuman Other,” (3) robots as the “Human Substitute,” (4) robots as the “Sentient Other,” (5) robots as the “Divine Other,” and (6) robots as the “Co-evolutionary Path to Immortality.” The likely and preferable scenario is the last one, which is compatible with an optimistic posthuman world in our evolutionary future. We imagine whether humans will meet the challenge of loving all living and non-living beings (including mechanical entities) might be the key to the co-evolution of both species and the ultimate happiness
Similar books and articles
Humanoid robots: A new kind of tool.Bryan Adams, Cynthia Breazeal, Rodney Brooks & Brian Scassellati - 2000 - IEEE Intelligent Systems 15 (4):25-31.
Reflections in a robot's eye: A cultural history and epistemological critque of humanoid robotics.Rand D. LeBouvier - unknown
Studying laughter in combination with two humanoid robots.Christian Becker-Asano, Takayuki Kanda, Carlos Ishi & Hiroshi Ishiguro - 2011 - AI and Society 26 (3):291-300.
Questionnaire-based social research on opinions of Japanese visitors for communication robots at an exhibition.Tatsuya Nomura, Takugo Tasaki, Takayuki Kanda, Masahiro Shiomi, Hiroshi Ishiguro & Norihiro Hagita - 2007 - AI and Society 21 (1-2):167-183.
Moral appearances: emotions, robots, and human morality. [REVIEW]Mark Coeckelbergh - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (3):235-241.
Modeling the acceptance of socially interactive robotics: Social presence in human–robot interaction.Dong-Hee Shin & Hyungseung Choo - 2011 - Interaction Studies 12 (3):430-460.
When robots fail: The complex processes of learning and development.Ludovic Marin & Olivier Oullier - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1067-1068.
In the hands of machines? The future of aged care.Robert Sparrow & Linda Sparrow - 2006 - Minds and Machines 16 (2):141-161.
Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design. [REVIEW]Aimee Wynsberghe - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):407-433.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Is the machine question the same question as the animal question?Katharyn Hogan - 2017 - Ethics and Information Technology 19 (1):29-38.
Mind Perception of Robots Varies With Their Economic Versus Social Function.Xijing Wang & Eva G. Krumhuber - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
Meta-narratives on machinic otherness: beyond anthropocentrism and exoticism.Min-Sun Kim - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-8.
Robot as the “mechanical other”: transcending karmic dilemma.Min-Sun Kim - 2019 - AI and Society 34 (2):321-330.
Love bytes: The future of bio–r2 relationships.Jeremiah Joven B. Joaquin & Hazel T. Biana - 2022 - Think 21 (61):93-99.
References found in this work
The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit.S. Turkle - 1985 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63:520.
The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots.Christoph Bartneck, Tomohiro Suzuki, Takayuki Kanda & Tatsuya Nomura - 2007 - AI and Society 21 (1-2):217-230.