Alvin I. Goldman's Account of Justification

Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is an attempt of a partial defence of Alvin I. Goldman's account of justification against the following kinds of criticism: a criticism on the sufficiency of Goldman's account; a criticism on the necessity of Goldman's account; a criticism on the capability of answering a certain kind of skepticism; and an expected criticism on the capability of determining the reliability of psychological processes without falling into circularity. While attempting to defend Goldman's account of justification, I tried to see what is true to Goldman's account. In so doing, I found out that some of the criticisms mentioned above do not apply to Goldman's account of justification. It would be good to see the blooming of Goldman's account if the blooming can contribute to the field of epistemology in an unprecedented way.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references