Week 6: SCOTUS ON UNIVERSALS

Abstract

book 2, distinction 3, extracts from which are in Hyman and Walsh. The first question is, in effect, whether any theory of individuation is needed. Aren't real things individual "from themselves", just by being real? The Latin says: ex se , sive ex natura sua , "from (or out of) itself, or from its nature". Elsewhere he uses as equivalent per se and de se . Se means itself, ex means from or out of, per means through, de means of or by or from. So the question is whether an individual thing gets it singularity or individuality from itself, not from anything else.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Scotus and Ockham.Colin Connors - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:141-153.
Recent work on the philosophy of duns scotus.Richard Cross - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (8):667-675.
John Duns Scotus.Thomas Williams - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#504,503)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references