The Forbidden Signs

Biosemiotics 9 (3):467-483 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While the field of semiotics has been active since it was started by Peirce, it appears like the last decade has been especially productive with a number of important new concepts being developed within the biosemiotics community. The novel concept of the Semiotic scaffold by Hoffmeyer is an important addition that offers insight into the hardware requirements for bio-semiosis. As any type of semiosis must be dependent upon Semiotic scaffolds, I recently argued that the process of semiosis has to be divided into two separate processes of sign establishment and sign interpretation, and that misalignment between the two processes result in faulty sign interpretation and over-signification. Such faulty signs were forbidden in the sign classification system of Peirce, so I defined them as forbidden signs. Here I present an analysis of the forbidden sign categories with examples from Occult semiotics. I also show that biological semiosis offers examples of forbidden signs, where the faulty interpretation of signs may lead to decimation of whole evolutionary lines of organisms. A new concept of Evolutionary memory which is applicable to both human and biological semiosis is explained as the combination of two processes; one leading to diversity generation within semiotic scaffolds followed by a second process of decimation of faulty signs during selection in specific learning environments. The analysis suggests that forbidden signs are always used as early stages in the iterative sign establishment process during semiosis.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Umberto Eco's semiotic threshold.Winfried Nöth - 2000 - Sign Systems Studies 28:49-60.
The Scope of Semiosis in Peirce's Philosophy.Felicia Ellen Kruse - 1989 - Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University
Peircean theory, psychosemiotics, and education.Howard A. Smith - 2005 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 37 (2):191–206.
Three Types of Semiosis.Marcello Barbieri - 2009 - Biosemiotics 2 (1):19-30.
Semiotics as the science of memory.Paul Bouissac - 2007 - Sign Systems Studies 35 (1-2):71-86.
Peirce's theory of signs.Albert Atkin - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Signs, social ontology, and critical realism.Tobin Nellhaus - 1998 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 28 (1):1–24.
From Semiotics to Semioethics.John Deely - 2004 - Semiotics 36 (2):242-261.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-05

Downloads
17 (#742,076)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The foundations of arithmetic.Gottlob Frege - 1884/1950 - Evanston, Ill.,: Northwestern University Press.
The foundations of arithmetic: a logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number.Gottlob Frege - 1959 - Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press. Edited by J. L. Austin.
Wonderful Life; The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History.Stephen Jay Gould - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (2):359-360.
Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types.Bertrand Russell - 1908 - American Journal of Mathematics 30 (3):222-262.
Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History.Stephen Jay Gould - 1991 - Journal of the History of Biology 24 (1):163-165.

Add more references