The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind
Cognition 119 (2):197-215 (2011)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.006
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
On the Psychology of Financial Compensations to Restore Fairness Transgressions: When Intentions Determine Value.Pieter T. M. Desmet, David De Cremer & Eric van Dijk - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (S1):105 - 115.
Aristotle’s Theory of Substance. [REVIEW]Charlotte Witt - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (1):98-101.
Ethical particularism and morally relevant properties.Jonathan Dancy - 1983 - Mind 92 (368):530-547.
Hard and soft accidental uniformities.Eduardo H. Flichman - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (1):31-43.
Is there a morally relevant difference between human and animal nonpersons?Evelyn Pluhar - 1988 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1 (1):59-68.
Stumbling on status: Abortion, stem cells, and faulty reasoning. [REVIEW]Karen Lebacqz - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):75-82.
Animal rights, animal minds, and human mindreading.Matteo Mameli & Lisa Bortolotti - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (2):84-89.
A new perspective on cross-cultural ethical evaluations: The use of conjoint analysis. [REVIEW]John Tsalikis, Bruce Seaton & Petros Tomaras - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 35 (4):281 - 292.
Some nonhuman animals can have pains in a morally relevant sense.William S. Robinson - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (1):51-71.
Making the morally relevant features explicit: A response to Carson strong.Bernard Gert - 2006 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (1):59-71.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
28 (#419,126)
6 months
2 (#300,644)
2014-01-20
Downloads
28 (#419,126)
6 months
2 (#300,644)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Stereotypes, theory of mind, and the action–prediction hierarchy.Evan Westra - 2019 - Synthese 196 (7):2821-2846.
Responsibility for forgetting.Samuel Murray, Elise D. Murray, Gregory Stewart, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Felipe De Brigard - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (5):1177-1201.
When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains.Liane Young & Rebecca Saxe - 2011 - Cognition 120 (2):202-214.
The development of intent-based moral judgment.Fiery Cushman, Rachel Sheketoff, Sophie Wharton & Susan Carey - 2013 - Cognition 127 (1):6-21.
How prescriptive norms influence causal inferences.Jana Samland & Michael R. Waldmann - 2016 - Cognition 156 (C):164-176.
References found in this work
Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception.H. Wimmer - 1983 - Cognition 13 (1):103-128.
False-belief understanding in infants.Renée Baillargeon, Rose M. Scott & Zijing He - 2010 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (3):110-118.
The Pervasive Impact of Moral Judgment.Dean Pettit & Joshua Knobe - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (5):586-604.
