Doing versus knowing

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1063-1064 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle's four causes frame Webb's question. Comprehension requires specification of trigger, function, mechanism, and representation. Robots are real models of function. Physical, biological, and epigenetic constraints delimit the hypothesis space for candidate mechanisms. Robots constitute a simplified system more susceptible to formal representation than the target system. They thus constitute an important tool in a constructivist development of scientific knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The nature and function of models.Ronald N. Giere - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1060-1060.
Can robots make good models of biological behaviour?Barbara Webb - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1033-1050.
Everyday creativity and the arts.Ruth Richards - 2007 - World Futures 63 (7):500 – 525.
Knowing that, knowing how, and knowing to do.Refeng Tang - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):426-442.
Knowing-how and knowing-that.Jeremy Fantl - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (3):451–470.
Knowing-that, knowing-how, and knowing philosophically.Stephen Hetherington - 2008 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):307-324.
Robots aren't the only physical models.Peter E. Midford - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1069-1070.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
32 (#471,613)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references