Limiting Laissez Faire Profits: The Financial Implications

Journal of Business Ethics 90 (3):425-436 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Traditional corporate finance endorses the principle of stockholder wealth maximization as the purpose of business. In light of recent scandals and legislation, businesses are increasingly expected to use financial resources in a manner which benefits society and not just the owners of the firm. This imputation of a corporate soul will necessarily reduce investor returns, which has at least two major financial implications for the firm and the economy. The first is that it may cause investors to change their required rates of return and thereby change the amount of capital available to firms, and the economy. The second is that it may implicitly replace equity with debt in the capital structure of firms, with all that implies for financing and corporate governance. The purpose of this article is to examine these implications and evaluate their sometimes counterintuitive consequences.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are free markets the cause of financial instability?Kevin Dowd - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (1):57-67.
The crisis of (confidence in) global capitalism.Barry Eichengreen - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (1):69-85.
“The free market” and the Asian crisis.Garett Jones - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (1):47-56.
The Tobin Tax.Heikki Patomäki - 2000 - Theory, Culture and Society 17 (4):77-91.
After libertarianism: Rejoinder to Narveson, McCloskey, Flew, and Machan.Jeffrey Friedman - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (1):113-152.
Democratic capitalism and respect for the value of freedom.Waheed Hussain - 2006 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):280-293.
Why Keynesianism triumphed or, could so many Keynesians have been wrong?Tyler Cowen - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (3-4):518-530.
Two rhetorical strategies of laissez-faire.Andy Denis - 2004 - Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):341-357.
Herbert Spencer and the Myth of Laissez-Faire.Mark Francis - 1978 - Journal of the History of Ideas 39 (2):317.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-02

Downloads
36 (#419,193)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?