Epistemic Corruption and the Research Impact Agenda

Ian James Kidd
Nottingham University
Joshua Forstenzer
University of Sheffield
Contemporary epistemologists of education have raised concerns about the distorting effects of some of the processes and structures of contemporary academia on the epistemic practice and character of academic researchers. Such concerns have been articulated using the concept of epistemic corruption. In this paper, we lend credibility to these theoretically-motivated concerns using the example of the research impact agenda during the period 2012-2014. Interview data from UK and Australian academics confirms the impact agenda system, at its inception, facilitated the development and exercise of epistemic vices. As well as vindicating theoretically-motivated claims about epistemic corruption, inclusion of empirical methods and material can help us put the concept to work in ongoing critical scrutiny of evolving forms of the research impact agenda.
Keywords epistemic vice  epistemic corruption  Research Excellence Framework  higher education
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Epistemic Corruption and Education.Ian James Kidd - 2019 - Episteme 16 (2):220-235.
Epistemic Corruption and Social Oppression.Ian James Kidd - forthcoming - In Ian James Kidd, Quassim Cassam & Heather Battaly (eds.), Vice Epistemology. London: Routledge.
Epistemic Corruption and Political Institutions.Ian James Kidd - 2021 - In Michael Hannon & Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), The Routledge Handbook to Political Epistemology. Routledge. pp. 357-358.
Modelling Epistemic Actions in Interrogative Belief Revision.Sebastian Enqvist - 2012 - Journal of Logic and Computation 22 (6):1335-1365.
Deep Epistemic Vices.Ian James Kidd - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Research 43:43-67..
Epistemic Badness.Anthony T. Flood - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:253-262.
Epistemic Badness.Anthony T. Flood - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:253-262.
Towards an Epistemic Evaluation of Think Tank Ecosystems: The Case of Epistemic Justice.Andréanne Veillette, François Claveau & Amandine Catala - forthcoming - In Critical Perspectives on Think Tanks: Power, Politics and Knowledge. Cheltenham: UK: Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. pp. 215-232.
Epistemic Insouciance.Quassim Cassam - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Research 43:1-20.
Political Corruption as Deformities of Truth.Yann Allard-Tremblay - 2014 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 9 (1):28-49.


Added to PP index

Total views

Recent downloads (6 months)

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes