Transcendental Aspects of Gender

Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 5:69-76 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the basic principles of gender philosophy applying methodological tools of communicative pragmatics; to demonstrate how gender construct can provide gender humanism formation as one of the ideals of democratic society; to specify gender glossary terms such as “gender democracy”, “gender equality” and “gender justice”. Methodology. In order to investigate a theoretical framework in feminist philosophy, methodological tools of communicative pragmatics and discursive ethics that were elaborated by modern German philosophers J. Habermas, K.-O. Apel for analyzing ethical gender principles and their legitimation ways have been used in this research. Scientific novelty. Based on methodological differences in concepts of J. Habermas and K.-O. Apel, two opposite approaches to gender concept analysis – rational and pragmatic (Habermas) and transcendental conceptual (K.-O. Apel) have been found out. The article helps to specify the framework of categories and concepts. According to the legitimation way of gender ethical theory it was discovered that such notions as “gender democracy”, “gender equality” and “gender justice” do not have the same meanings. According to the analysis of communicative action program and consensus, the “gender equality” concept by Habermas is an artificial social construct that is methodologically grounded in cognitivism and diminishes the possibilities of gender values legitimation. According to K.-O. Apel, the concept of “gender justice” is based on transcendental moral and ethical sense of opposite genders unity and does not discharge unequal distribution of responsibilities and any invasion as well as represents certain extent of their difference. Conclusions. Fast growing gender changes in the society face ageold drawbacks of moral and spiritual principles of communities, taking into account social and cultural, national and gender identity. Thorough understanding of various approaches to feminism philosophy leads more to complementarity of male and female principles of humanity with further acceptance of gender roles that reflect more complicated panorama of spiritual life.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Трансцендентное пространство гендера.Volodymyr V. Khmel & O. M. Korkh - 2014 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 5:69-76.
Трансцендентное пространство гендера.Volodymyr V. Khmel & O. M. Korkh - 2014 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 5:69-76.
A dispositional account of gender.Jennifer McKitrick - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (10):2575-2589.
Gender Reality.Sr Mary Prudence Allen - 2014 - Solidarity: The Journal for Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics 4 (1):Article 1.
Thinking About Gender.Julie A. Nelson - 1992 - Hypatia 7 (3):138-154.
Gender.Claire Colebrook - 2003 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Gender Thinking.Stephen Smith - 1992 - Temple University Press.
On the Construction of Advanced Gender Culture.Lin Tan - 2007 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 2:25-34.
Gender and "Postmodern War".Robin May Schott - 1996 - Hypatia 11 (4):19 - 29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-16

Downloads
10 (#1,168,820)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Gender project of the future.V. V. Khmil - 2019 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 15:7-10.
Contractualistic measurements of the gender: Possibilities and borders.D. V. Usov - 2019 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 15:92-100.
Gender aspects of relationship in the system of management.T. V. Andrushchenko, O. V. Cherednyk & R. O. Belozorova - 2019 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 15:49-57.
Fear of social alienation of love as gender characteristics.V. V. Melnyk, L. І Моzhovyi & I. A. Reshetova - 2019 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 15:22-29.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Технология и наука.В. Г Горохов - 2012 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 34 (4):5-17.
Политика и наука.Н. М Кейзеров - 1975 - Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy 6:227-229.
Религия и наука.Ю. С Моркина - 2008 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 18 (4):252-255.

Add more references