Quine, Naturalism and First-Person Epistemology (In Persian)
Iranian Institute of Philosophy (IRIP) Publishing (
forthcoming)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
The book will discuss and criticize the objections from Blackburn, Searle and Glock to Quine's arguments for the indeterminacy of translation, i.e., that these arguments result in a denial of first-person authority, as well as Hylton’s solution to these objections. The book argues that these objections, as well as Hylton's solution, all rely on a misconstrual of Quine, among other things, that there can be a distinction between meaning and translation for Quine. I will then offer a Strawsonian-Wittgensteinian account of first-person authority and show that this account can work within Quine’s naturalism.