Some methodological issues in the development of quality of life measures for the evaluation of medical interventions

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (3):181-191 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses a series of important methodological issues in developing targeted health-related quality of life measures in studies of the effects of medical interventions. Such measures cannot be developed unless the evaluator understands the life domains that medical interventions affect. Qualitative discovery methods are needed to obtain this understanding. Once domains are targeted for measurement, careful and systematic laboratory pilot work should be used to select initial scale items. Psychometric evaluation of response patterns in subsequent field tests is needed to assess the measures. Less concern should be directed to internal consistency reliability of scales in the psychometric evaluation and more to the ability of short scales to reproduce total scale variance and to provide precise measurement within the range of the outcome where effects are expected. The paper closes with a discussion of modern methods of item response scaling that can be used to address these issues

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quality of life--a response to K C Calman.A. Cribb - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (3):142-145.
Quality of life - evaluation or description.Dietrer Birnbacher - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (1):25-36.
The Meaning of Body Experience Evaluation in Oncology.Jenny Slatman - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (4):295-311.
Quality of life is a process not an outcome.Leah McClimans & John P. Browne - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (4):279-292.
Quality of life in cancer patients--an hypothesis.K. C. Calman - 1984 - Journal of Medical Ethics 10 (3):124-127.
Interpretability, validity, and the minimum important difference.Leah McClimans - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (6):389-401.
Towards self-determination in quality of life research: a dialogic approach.Leah McClimans - 2010 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (1):67-76.
Measuring the quality of life: Why, how and what?Matti Häyry - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2):17.
Preferences, needs and QALYs.J. Cohen - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (5):267-272.
The sanctity-of-life doctrine in medicine: a critique.Helga Kuhse - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
32 (#473,773)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references