The perceived credibility of scientific claims, paranormal phenomena, and miracles among primary teacher students: A comparative study

Science & Education 10 (5):493-511 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Time Travel, Parahistory and Hume.Roy A. Sorensen - 1987 - Philosophy 62 (240):227 - 236.
Miracles and Agents.George D. Chryssides - 1975 - Religious Studies 11 (3):319 - 327.
Hume's abject failure: the argument against miracles.John Earman - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Miracles with method.John B. Gill - 1977 - Sophia 16 (3):19 - 26.
Bayes, Hume, and Miracles.John Earman - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (3):293-310.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-22

Downloads
8 (#1,291,989)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Science, Worldviews, and Education.Hugh G. Gauch - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (6-7):667-695.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
Proofs and refutations (IV).I. Lakatos - 1963 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14 (56):296-342.

Add more references