Rawls and the Collective Ownership of Natural Abilities

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):19-28 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In two passages of A Theory of Justice Rawls suggests that, as a consequence of his egalitarian theory, the natural talents of persons are common property.We see then that the difference principle represents, in effect, an agreement to regard the distribution of natural talents as a common asset and to share in the benefits of this distribution whatever it turns out to be. The two principles are equivalent, as I have remarked, to an undertaking to regard the distribution of natural abilities as a collective asset so that the more fortunate are to benefit only in ways that help those who have lost out.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Lockean Argument for Basic Income.Daniel Moseley - 2011 - Basic Income Studies 6 (2):11.
Rawls and Natural Aristocracy.Matthew Clayton - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):239-259.
Capitalism and Self-Ownership.Andrew Kernohan - 1988 - Social Philosophy and Policy 6 (1):60.
Towards a New Conception of Ownership.Sibyl Ann Schwarzenbach - 1985 - Dissertation, Harvard University
Abilities to Act.Randolph Clarke - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (12):893-904.
Property, Persons, Boundaries: The Argument from Other-Ownership.Hugh Breakey - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (2):189-210.


Added to PP

47 (#250,910)

6 months
5 (#153,513)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Kernohan
Dalhousie University

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.

Add more references